From owner-freebsd-virtualization@FreeBSD.ORG  Sun Oct  7 18:12:18 2012
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-virtualization@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-virtualization@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7E7A8106566B;
	Sun,  7 Oct 2012 18:12:18 +0000 (UTC)
	(envelope-from sree.openwrk@gmail.com)
Received: from mail-oa0-f54.google.com (mail-oa0-f54.google.com
	[209.85.219.54])
	by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 275B88FC0A;
	Sun,  7 Oct 2012 18:12:17 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by mail-oa0-f54.google.com with SMTP id n9so4218120oag.13
	for <multiple recipients>; Sun, 07 Oct 2012 11:12:17 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
	h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to
	:cc:content-type;
	bh=bknxmxCtPrFlFEMe8+4j9VWmInvq5Du1PONl3elqgCM=;
	b=BLLJ+IANUIGWTFHe1gq6KdqVnS4asFzLXVbE6uDW7iIkdThGbcpgYUVwvG/Ckm9+io
	K40y/BDXZrdWxEZyFK0a8xlub0Qd+Xm1J/f0jG3Fy/GbTuHkW3gVjoHjqWG58k9Y13DA
	3R8XPw2k7NGySAvgkxN2EtqPR5iBgkfRmWXu5iFf00HMc3FDw7sRPxx462SeGiZl0Bd6
	+eFhTeSIvnxRX8SvhcF3y7TwKBduuZuFSim5mJspVB0GIbEazCo40YBXkylPs7s7IgRi
	9Fb4L7Tl8Ps5rdIIxIBLX62PkT1onKenxSOSAKR8h/ogkMKYiQyy0NBDrolAgR6oZ3mB
	Rqqw==
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.182.31.50 with SMTP id x18mr321429obh.56.1349633537346; Sun,
	07 Oct 2012 11:12:17 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.60.141.132 with HTTP; Sun, 7 Oct 2012 11:12:17 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <CAFgRE9Ec74HQ9TDs_BwmYwLCebZVg2tQbyxNxJfuvsSX1qQFhQ@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CADYnSLDW492JKvQXN0wTJzV6VdCF_ZxRg4OnaTxqKdWjGzQk_w@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAFgRE9Ec74HQ9TDs_BwmYwLCebZVg2tQbyxNxJfuvsSX1qQFhQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 7 Oct 2012 11:12:17 -0700
Message-ID: <CADYnSLAHf01ZzEn7tQiR3dv2v63mDMj0B3=X5DDsbkS-dG46MQ@mail.gmail.com>
From: "sree.openwrk" <sree.openwrk@gmail.com>
To: Neel Natu <neelnatu@gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5
Cc: freebsd-virtualization@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: Bhyve: panic: "Unregistered use of FPU in kernel" when starting
	guest
X-BeenThere: freebsd-virtualization@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Discussion of various virtualization techniques FreeBSD supports."
	<freebsd-virtualization.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-virtualization>,
	<mailto:freebsd-virtualization-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-virtualization>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-virtualization@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-virtualization-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-virtualization>,
	<mailto:freebsd-virtualization-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 07 Oct 2012 18:12:18 -0000

Hey Neel
Sure. I will reproduce the issue and try to narrow down the problem.
Will update you, if I am able to narrow down the problem.

Thanks

On Thu, Oct 4, 2012 at 9:07 PM, Neel Natu <neelnatu@gmail.com> wrote:

> Hi svas,
>
> On Thu, Oct 4, 2012 at 5:58 PM, sree.openwrk <sree.openwrk@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> > Hi
> > I am seeing frequent kernel panic when I try to run the guest OS. I have
> the
> > latest Freebsd (I compiled the latest code from
> > svn://svn.freebsd.org/base/projects/bhyve and installed it in my
> machine).
> > While trying to run the pre-built guest provided at
> > http://people.freebsd.org/~neel/bhyve/vm1.tar.gz I get the kernel panic
> > (panic: Unregistered use of FPU in kernel)
> > I am attaching the core.txt.
> > I also want to mention that I was successfully able to boot in to the
> guest
> > OS couple of times. But around 7/10 times I get thsi host kernel panic.
> >
> > stack trace:
> > vm_run() at vm_run+0xec
> > vmmdev_ioctl() at vmmdev_ioctl+0x4ea
> > devfs_ioctl_f() at devfs_ioctl_f+0x7a
> > kern_ioctl() at kern_ioctl+0xcd
> > sys_ioctl() at sys_ioctl+0xfd
> > amd64_syscall() at amd64_syscall+0x304
> > Xfast_syscall() at Xfast_syscall+0xf7
> >
>
> I am seeing this too but nowhere as frequently as you are. I hit this
> last night for the first time and not since.
>
> There hasn't been any change in this part of the code for quite some time
> now.
>
> Since you can trigger this much more frequently that me, would it be
> possible for you to narrow down which change caused this? It would be
> hugely helpful.
>
> best
> Neel
>
> >
> > regards
> > svas
> >
> >
>

